File Name: programming language syntax and semantics .zip
Many CS 1 students, for example, have difficulties because they don't yet know the programming language well enough to. A frequently-used technique in functional languages. Language fea-tures are manifestations of type structure.
- Syntax and Semantics of Programming Languages
- Formal syntax and semantics of programming languages - a laboratory based approach
- Software Languages
Skip to search form Skip to main content You are currently offline.
Syntax and Semantics of Programming Languages
Show all documents The main point of abstract syntax is to omit the details of physical representa- tion, leaving only the forms of the abstract trees that may be produced. For example, the abstract syntax has no need for parentheses since they are just used to disambiguate expressions. Once this assessment has been done by the parser, the resulting abstract trees have unambiguous meaning, since the branching of trees accurately conveys the hierarchical structure of a phrase.
Whereas the concrete syntax defines the way programs in a lan- guage are actually written, the abstract syntax captures the pure structure of phrases in the language by specifying the logical relations relative to the intended semantics between parts of the language. We can think of an ab- stract syntax tree as embodying the derivation history of a phrase in the language without mentioning all of the terminal and nonterminal symbols.
Lightweight Behavior Based Language for Requirements Modeling Whether or not a software system satisfies the anticipated user requirements is ultimately determined by the behaviors of the software. So it is necessary and valuable to research requirements modeling language and technique from the perspective of behavior. This paper presents a lightweight behavior based requirements modeling language BDL with formal syntax and semantics , and a general-purpose requirements description model BRM synthesizing the concepts of viewpoint and scenario.
BRM is good for modeling large and complex system due to its structure is very clear. In addition, the modeling process is demonstrated through the case study On-Line Campus Management System.
Some of the bene- fits of providing a formal syntax and semantics for a work- flow language are well-known, i. Mappings, in turn, make inter- model dataflow repositories a practical possibility. A recent. Download Download PDF Context-free grammars have been used to specify the syntax of programming languages. Attribute grammars provide a framework for formally specifying the semantics of a language based on its context-free grammar and for addressing the mildly context-sensitive features of programming languages , such as agreement of the data types of variables in expressions with data type declarations.
Game semantics for interface middleweight Java The aim of the present paper is to extend the range of the game approach towards real-life programming languages , by fo- cussing on Java-style objects. To that end, we define an impera- tive object calculus, called Interface Middleweight Java IMJ , in- tended to capture contextual interactions of code written in Mid- dleweight Java MJ , as specified by interfaces with inheritance.
We present both equational contextual equivalence and inequa- tional contextual approximation full abstraction results for the language. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first deno- tational models of this kind. Foundations of Global Computing Such a body of experimental activity needs theoret- ical support. Often, the relevant theory does not exist and will have to be developed.
F OG will provide for that by focusing on models, semantics , specifications, and types. A fundamental activity will be to design new expressive foundational calculi in which a wide variety of phenomena mobility, security, uncertainty, trust can be described. Such calculi will require a semantic the- ory to support new reasoning principles, and new logics for expressing network and agent behaviours, as well as specification and verification techniques. The coordina- tion aspects of mobile code will be studied by defining new models under the hypothesis of open environments with dynamically reconfigurable topologies supporting both physical and logical mobility.
Further along this avenue, F OG will develop a formal model for the sep- aration of the three main concerns involved in service- oriented architectures: computation, coordination, and distribution. For example, Pettorossi and Proietti describe a strategy for par- tial deduction. Their technique relies on a simple folding strategy involving no gen- eralisation, so termination of the strategy is not guaranteed.
Such a reachability analysis is an integral part of partial deduction algorithms. Once embedded within a model provider, OCL is still of limited utility since a side-effect free language cannot modify anything.
UML navigations and OCL constraints are used to specify the relationships between input and output model elements. No model mutations occur within the definition of the model transformation, rather the necessary model mutations are relegated to an implementation detail to be orchestrated by a practical tool. A Simple Syntax for Complex Semantics. MoL Modelling Syntactic and Semantic Tasks with Linguistically Enriched Recursive Neural Networks DS is a very popular approach to lexical semantics and while there have been attempts at making hand-crafted symbolic lexical semantic databases, most notably WordNet Fellbaum, , these approaches are expensive to create, slow to update and generally cover fewer words than DS approaches.
DS systems in contrast are unsupervised in nature and therefore are cheaper to create and contain semantic information about significantly wider range of words. In lexical substitution tasks DS-based approaches were shown to perform at the same level as native English speakers with a college education Rapp, This success has lead to DS being used not only as a semantic analysis for words but also being integrated into NLP systems including: machine translation Alkhouli et al.
Compositional Semantics for Linguistic Formalisms of logic programming languages, define a fixpoint semantics for unification-based grammars by taking the least fixpoint of the parsing step operator as the denotation of a grammar These languages do not lend themselves to simultaneous execution of different parts of the pro- gram, because any command may depend on the changes to variables caused by previous commands.
An enormous amount of effort has gone into creat- ing algorithms that allow compilers to discover automatically to what extent commands may be executed simultaneously. Execution speed is therefore ul- timately limited by the speed with which individual instructions can be exe- cuted.
Another effect of imperative programming is that to know the state of a computation, one must know the values of all the variables. This is why compilers that provide a postexecution dump of the values of all variables or, better yet, compilers that allow variables to be examined and changed during debugging are so handy. These are private copies of the objects corresponding to the parent classes private, that is, up to the presence of static members.
There is, however, a question of how much of these objects is visible. Java chooses that—unlike in our implementation above—only one method of a given name and signature remains, no matter how many there might have been on the inheritance chain, whereas every field remains in the result, and can be accessed by casting.
The latter makes some sense because each field presumably has invariants governing it, so keeping them separate and hence all present is wise. In contrast, it is easy to imagine an implementation that also makes all the methods available, not only the ones lowest i.
Many scripting languages take the latter approach. The Design of Formal Languages The questioning of the notion of form ality h ad led to a brief survey of different definitions of formal language.
Two surprising things em erged from this study. The first was the num ber of basic text books dealing w ith formal languages of one form or another that em ployed the term formal language w ith o u t defining either formal language or even formality. The second was that w hen definitions of formal language were given, they, either explicitly or im plicitly, seem ed to consider only textual representations as formal.
Even w h e n the definitions could be in terp reted as ap p ly in g to non -tex tu al re p re se n ta tio n s the a u th o rs sh ied aw ay from a sse rtin g th a t su ch representations could be formal.
W ith the definition that I now advocate the form ality of a language could be tested empirically and thus in m y term s a form al language could be any form of representation.
Thus, I d ropped the w ord graphical from the aim of the thesis. MoL Philosophy of logical practice: a case study in formal semantics S: Where do you want me to start? Do you want me to start [with] how I came into computational linguistics? Or where I started? If you want that, I can tell you that I started with a major interest in logic. I studied at this. When I met my mentor he puzzled me in some discussions with him about ambiguity, particularly about ambiguity in natural language. And I came into this field out of this aspect — where I got intrigued by how to deal with this cognitive capacity called understanding and the human capacity to choose between different possibilities.
So I came from logic, and I just deviated. I had to bootstrap the statistics and probability theory and all the things that I needed in this field. But here the square brackets are, in fact, part of the syntax of the object language — the brackets are included in the formation rules as is often done in first-order logic. XPL: a language for modular homogeneous language embedding Grammar composition can be used to define new languages in terms of old. The AHEAD approach  allows grammars to be refined by viewing them as being defined in terms of data members tokens and methods syntax productions.
Grammar com- position in AHEAD produces the union of two grammars in terms of the sets of data members and methods where overlapping productions are controlled via a run-super mechanism. Grammar composition operators are described in  that allow an existing grammar to be extended with new productions, updates existing productions with new alternatives, and replaces an existing production so that all references are updated ac- cordingly, and includes an early use of quasi-quotes for syntax construction.
Attribute grammars can also be used to define extensible languages as described in . A number of authors, including  and , describe formal properties of grammars that allow grammars to be compiled separately and the resulting combination of the parse tables do not lead to ambiguous languages.
Formal syntax and semantics of programming languages - a laboratory based approach
In computer science , the syntax of a computer language is the set of rules that defines the combinations of symbols that are considered to be correctly structured statements or expressions in that language. This applies both to programming languages , where the document represents source code , and to markup languages , where the document represents data. The syntax of a language defines its surface form. Documents that are syntactically invalid are said to have a syntax error. When designing the syntax of a language, a designer might start by writing down examples of both legal and illegal strings , before trying to figure out the general rules from these examples.
Formal language-generation mechanisms, usually called grammars, are commonly used to describe the syntax of programming languages. Page 8. BNF and.
Example: What is the syntax of a C if statement? What are the corresponding semantics? Inother words, the language of tokens is regular more on this later. Begin with a string consisting of the start symbol;ii.